中文摘要
知识经济条件下，知识产权制度之所以比以前更加重要是因为知识和信息日益成为财富，成为经济发展最大的推动力。毋庸质疑，知识产权在本质上是一种法律赋予的合法垄断权，然而，正如任何权利都可能被滥用一样，知识产权同样可能被滥用。知识产权滥用会破坏市场竞争秩序，损害社会和消费者的利益，因此知识产权的滥用必须得到一定的规制。知识产权制度自身可以形成一定的限制，权利相对人也可以从民法的公平正义、诚实信用原则中寻求对于这种滥用的抗辩。但是，对知识产权滥用最有效的规制手段是反垄断法。这与反垄断法保护有效竞争、维护公正而有效率的市场秩序的法律价值是相一致的，也是各国知识产权领域反垄断立法和执法的经验总结。
由于我国知识产权制度起步较晚，反垄断法律制度尚不完善，在过去很长一段时间，学者对于利用反垄断法规制知识产权滥用问题的研究较少。近年来，随着跨国公司不断进入我国市场，其利用知识产权占有上的优势排斥和阻碍我国企业的发展，破坏我国市场正常竞争秩序的现象越来越严重。面对这一形势，我国学者开始思考和研究是否有必要将知识产权滥用行为纳入反垄断法的调整范围，如何进行法律上的规制，如何认识知识产权制度与反垄断法之间的关系等问题。但是学界对如何理清知识产权正当行使与知识产权滥用的界限，如何将反垄断法适用于知识产权滥用行为等问题的系统研究还很少。随着2007年我国《反垄断法》的颁布，对利用反垄断法规制知识产权滥用行为的具体适用问题的研究变得更为重要和迫切。本文正是在这样的背景下，试图对这一问题做出理论上的研究和探讨，以期对我国该领域今后的立法和实践提供一些有价值的建议。
本文运用比较分析、历史分析、案例分析等方法对上述问题进行了研究和探讨。文章分三个部分对以上内容进行了阐述：
第一部分包括一至三章。第一章对反垄断法的基础理论问题进行了一般分析。首先作者介绍了垄断以及反垄断法的定义，进而分析了反垄断法的性质及特征、历史发展及发展趋势、反垄断法的规制对象等问题。第二章对知识产权滥用的相关问题进行了分析。首先介绍了欧盟指控微软垄断案并对该案涉及的知识产权滥用问题作了简要评析，然后从理论上对知识产权滥用的定义、构成要件、成因及表现形式进行了分析。第三章在前两章的基础上进一步分析了二者的关系，指出了反垄断法与知识产权法既有一致又有冲突的方面，二者存在矛盾和统一。同时阐述了利用反垄断法规制知识产权滥用行为的必要性。
第二部分为第四章，主要介绍了美国、欧盟和日本等国家对知识产权滥用行为的反垄断法规制，阐述了各国反垄断立法的发展，列举了各国反垄断法立法中规制知识产权滥用行为的先进的法律规定及执法经验。同时对主要国际条约和协定中规制知识产权滥用行为的反垄断规则进行了详细阐述，以期对我国利用反垄断法规制知识产权滥用行为的立法及执法和司法实践施以借鉴作用。
第三部分为第五章，是全文的落脚点。在前文分析的基础上，首先总结了国外主要国家及国际条约的相关立法与实践对我国的启示，进而针对我国利用反垄断法规制知识产权滥用行为的立法与实践提出了一些建议。我国应该在反垄断法的原则和精神的指导下尽快制定符合我国国情的规制知识产权滥用行为的专门规章，同时应进一步明确反垄断执法机构及其职权，理顺行政执法与司法适用的关系，明确司法适用的一些具体问题。
关键词：知识产权；知识产权滥用；反垄断法；规制
Abstract
On the condition of knowledge economy, intellectual property rights are more important than before because the knowledge and information became wealth day by day, it has been becoming the greatest motive force of economy development. Undoubtedly, intellectual property rights are in essence legal monopoly rights that the law entrusts to, but just as any right will be used in an unreasonable way, the legal monopoly of intellectual property rights will be abused too. The abuse of intellectual property rights will destroy market competition order and damage interests of the society and consumers. So the abuse of intellectual property rights must get certain restricted. The system of intellectual property rights can form certain restriction itself, the owner of intellectual property rights can seek to the counterplea of abuse from fairness, justice and honesty principle of the civil law too. However, it is the antirust law that can be the most effective constrain means to the abuse of intellectual property rights. This is compatible with the legal value of the antitrust law that protects competition, fairness effectively and efficient market order and it’s also the summary of experience about antitrust legislation and enforcement in the field of intellectual property rights law in various countries.
Because the intellectual property system in our country establishes more lately than other countries and the antirust law system has a lot of weak points, scholars’ researches on the issue restricting the abuse of intellectual property rights by antitrust law are insufficient in the past time. Recent years, with the multinational entering our country, the phenomenon that the multinational exclude and block the development of our country’s enterprises, destroy the competition order of our country’s market becomes more and more serious. In the face of this position, the scholars of our country began to think and study whether we have the necessity to bring it into line with the antitrust method adjustment scope, how the abuse of intellectual property rights are restricted by law, how to realize the relationship between the intellectual property system and antitrust law. However, the researches of leaning field on how to distinguish the exertion of intellectual property rights and the abuse of intellectual property rights, how the antitrust law to be applied to the abuse of intellectual property rights are very seldom. Along with the publication of Antirust Law of our country in 2007, it is more important and impending that we research how to regulate the
