知识产权法论文栏目提供最新知识产权法论文格式、知识产权法硕士论文范文。详情咨询QQ:1847080343(论文辅导)

在线交易中的商标间接侵权研究

日期:2018年01月15日 编辑: 作者:无忧论文网 点击次数:1874
论文价格:300元/篇 论文编号:lw201108261310377145 论文字数:39666 所属栏目:知识产权法论文
论文地区:中国 论文语种:中文 论文用途:硕士毕业论文 Master Thesis
ere sold online are counterfeit goods; b) whether online auction providers know infrigment in there sites; c) whether online auction providers fulfill prior obligation to check tradmark; d) whether online auction providers take reasonable measures to stop infrigement after they know.
The third part examines the judicial interpretations of trademark and anti-counterfeiting laws in France, Germany and the United States, the implications of these decisions on online auction providers. Analyzes the court's opinion in the case, especially the issue of the defendant's knowledge, and how to assess allocation of the burden of policing websites for infringing activity. Firstly, analyzes the anti-counterfeiting legislation and indirect related trademark infringement cases of United States. Secondly, analyzes the anti-counterfeiting legislation and the cases of French famous luxury brand owers case and eBay in France. Thirdly, analyzes the anti-counterfeiting legislation of Germany and Belgium, and the cases of Rolex v. Ricardo.de in Germany and Lancôme v. eBay in Belgium. Discusses how courts in United States, France, German and Belgium handle counterfeit product availability on publicly accessible websites and compares and contrasts the findings of the courts and the possible effects.Finally, draws a conclusion that the trademark owners and online auction providers should work together to develop search programs, and the system for indirect trademark infringement should be modified to banlance the interests of tradmark owers and online auction providers.
The fourth part points out the deficiency of the system of indirect trademark infringement in our country and provids some suggestions for improvement. Firstly, discusses the status and deficiency of indirect trademark infringement: confusion is not in the leading position in confirming indirect trademark infringement; rules in constructive conditions of indirect trademark infringement is not clear; there is no provisions of indirect trademark infringement under network environments and no Online Transactions Law .Finally, provids some suggestions for improvement: make sure confusion is in the leading position in confirming indirect trademark infringement; make definite rules in constructive conditions of indirect trademark infringement; establish the rules of indirect trademark infringement under network environments and enact Online Transactions Law.
Key Words: online auction;tradmark infringement;indirect tradmark infrigement

 

目  录
引言 1
第一章 在线交易中的商标间接侵权现状 2
第一节 在线交易市场现状分析 2
一、在线交易市场的机遇 2
二、在线交易市场的挑战 3
第二节 在线交