英语论文栏目提供最新英语论文格式、英语硕士论文范文。详情咨询QQ:1847080343(论文辅导)

档案袋评价对高中生英语读后续写自我效能感和写作能力的影响探讨

日期:2023年03月23日 编辑:ad201107111759308692 作者:无忧论文网 点击次数:496
论文价格:150元/篇 论文编号:lw202303171115136216 论文字数:42555 所属栏目:英语论文
论文地区:中国 论文语种:中文 论文用途:硕士毕业论文 Master Thesis
ing stories,philosophicalarticles,or materials that are closely related to students’school and life experiences,keepingthe content coherent and interesting,conducive to imagination,suitable for students’language level,with a certain length,such as above 500 words(Wang,2013).

Wang believes that writing practice combined with reading comprehension can improvelearners’writing ability.The level of foreign language learning efficiency is positivelycorrelated with the degree of integration of language comprehension and output,that is,thecloser the combination of the two,the stronger the synergistic effect,and the better theforeign language learning effect.Continuation writing closely links language comprehensionand output,while simultaneously meeting the characteristics of modern English teaching,such as relatively few opportunities for listening and speaking and many opportunities forreading and writing.

Therefore,continuation writing is theoretically possible.It can significantly improve theefficiency of foreign language learning and the learners’English writing ability.

2.2 Portfolio Assessment

2.2.1 Definition of Portfolio Assessment

The wide use of portfolio assessment in language teaching and learning has given rise toits various definitions in the past three decades.

Portfolio assessment,as a qualitative evaluation technique emerged with the evaluationreform movement in the 1980s to improve the isolation of evaluation from the intellectualcontext.The portfolio was seen as a selection of relevant materials,which combined theteacher’s and students’feedback.It provided a chance for the instructor to further evaluatestudents’progress in their writing portfolio assessment process(Moya,1994).Moya referredto the word‘evaluate’for the first time.

Moreover,Delett,Barnhardt and Kevorkian(1998)argued that portfolio assessmentswere systematic,longitudinal collections of students’work created for specific,known instructional goals and assessed against the same criteria.Ruo(2009)claimed that portfolioassessment was an assessment method combining students’learning,reflection,sharing andimprovement while learning and growth to give full play to the advantages of learning.Similarly,Brett(2014)stated that portfolios assimilated learning and reflection,and a capableprofessional was needed to collect these materials.

Thus,portfolio assessment is a process assessment tool,by means of which studentsselect,collect,and reflect on their writings to demonstrate their progress.In the meanwhile,teachers can appropriately help students,for example by explaining the assessment criteria tostudents.

Chapter Three Methodology.........................19

3.1 Research Questions..............................19

3.2 Participants.............................20

3.3 Instruments..................................20

Chapter Four Results and Discussion.............................31

4.1 The Effect of Portfolio Assessment on Students’Continuation Writing Self-efficacy................31

4.1.1 The Effect of Portfolio Assessment on Continuation Writing Task Self-efficacy.................33

4.1.2 The Effect of Portfolio Assessment on Continuation Writing Skill Self-efficacy.....................36

Chapter Five Conclusion..........................50

5.1 Major Findings...........................50

5.2 Pedagogical Implications...............................51

5.3 Limitations and Suggestions for Further Study......................53

Chapter Four Results and Discussion

4.1 The Effect of Portfolio Assessment on Students’Continuation WritingSelf-efficacy

It is necessary to test the presence of normality(Hair et al.,2010).The skewness andkurtosis tests were conducted to check whether the data were normally distributed.As seen inTable 4.1,the skewness and kurtosis indices ranged from-.415 to.519 and-1.177 to-.193,respectively,within the ranges of|3|and|8|recommended by Kline(2015).Thus,thenormality of the data was guaranteed.

英语论文参考

As is shown by the 5-point Likert Scale,if the mean value of the item is between 2.4