英语论文栏目提供最新英语论文格式、英语硕士论文范文。详情咨询QQ:1847080343(论文辅导)

混合学习环境下高中生英语学习互动特点以及影响因素探讨

日期:2023年03月05日 编辑:ad201107111759308692 作者:无忧论文网 点击次数:486
论文价格:150元/篇 论文编号:lw202302171108258894 论文字数:44562 所属栏目:英语论文
论文地区:中国 论文语种:中文 论文用途:硕士毕业论文 Master Thesis
. While Bonk (Zhan&Li, 2009) had defined blended learning in his "Handbook of Blended Learning": a combination of face-to-face instruction with online learning. 

Chinese scholar Professor He (2004) translated B-Learning as "blended learning". In his view, blended learning refers to a combination of the advantages of traditional teaching and E-Learning, which reflects the dual-master teaching method not only reflecting the leading role of teachers, but also the student's dominant position. 

Li & Zhao (2004) thought that B-Learning is a term that has been widely concerned by the education community after it is summed up by the teaching experience. His main idea is to organically combine traditional face-to-face learning and online learning, and to give play to their respective advantages, thereby reducing education costs and improving the effectiveness of education. 

2.2 Interaction

2.2.1 Definitions of interaction

"Interaction" is defined in the English dictionary "The Merriam Webster Dictionary" as ": Mutual or Reciprocal action or influence; have the same feelings one for others". In English interpretation, interaction is mutual or interaction or influence, and both parties to the interaction can receive the same feedback. From the analysis of Chinese etymology, "mutual" represents the meaning of "alternative and mutual"; for "movement", it mainly represents the meaning of "function or change". In both Chinese and English interpretations, it can be seen that "interaction" refers to the process by which the two interacting parties have a certain effect or influence on both parties through a certain interaction. While EFL is short for English as a Foreign language, so EFL interaction means interaction between English learning as a foreign language.

The American social psychologist Mead (1913) believed that interaction was carried out between people using a variety of symbols as an intermediary. American scholar Brown (1994:78) proposed: Interaction refers to a process in which at least two people share ideas, emotions, and exchange information and influence to each other.

Chinese researcher Xu (2005) pointed out that interaction can be divided into broad and narrow senses. In a broad sense, interaction refers to the interaction and influence of all things. However, the interaction in the narrow sense occurs frequently in daily life, that is, under the relative social background and specific circumstances, people have different forms, different attributes, and different degrees of interaction and influence.

Chapter Three Methodology ......................... 31

3.1 Research questions ........................ 31

3.2 Participants .................................... 31

3.3 Instruments ............................. 32

Chapter Four Data Analysis and Discussion ............................... 36

4.1 Validity and reliability of the questionnaire ......................... 36

4.1.1 Reliability Test ........................ 36

4.1.2 Validity test .................................. 37

Chapter Five Conclusion......................... 58

5.1 Major findings .............................. 58

5.1.1 Characteristics of high school students’ EFL interaction in blended learning environment............... 58

5.1.2 Influencing factors of high school students’ EFL interaction in blended learning environment............... 59

Chapter Four Data Analysis and Discussion

4.1 Validity and reliability of the questionnaire

4.1.1 Reliability Test

In order to ensure the stability and consistency of the questionnaire test results, a reliability test is required before data analysis. The reliability test index of this study is based on Cronbach's Alpha coefficient, which is also the most used reliability test index. The higher the coefficient, the higher the reliability of the questionnaire or scale. Generally speaking, a coefficient greater than 0.8 indicates good reliability, and a coefficient greater than 0.9 indicates very good reliability. A value between 0.7 a