全球化作为一个概念和术语是不容易确定的，可以用来描述或涉及几个不同的方式。无论是全球化国际化，全球化是一个形容词来描述国家之间的跨境关系；全球化西化或美国化，现代性的社会结构，传播世界各地经常破坏现有的文化和地方沿途自决。
全球化作为全球化的自由化所指的是“除政府限制运动的国家之间为了创造一个开放的过程中，无国界的世界经济。”；或全球化大众化这个词在全球是指在世界范围内，“全球化”这意味着制作过程中的各种对象和经验有人在地球的每一个角落的因特网和电视。因此，反全球化遭受同样的遗传性问题，虽然它可以肯定地说，有一个连续的最肯定的模糊性和不确定性的不同意见和团体连接的主题。
Globalisation Social Views
Globalisation as a concept and term is not easily definable and can be used to describe or relate in several different ways. Whether it be globalisation as internationalisation in which globalisation is viewed as just one more adjective to describe cross-border relations between countries; globalisation as westernisation or Americanisation in which the social structures of modernity are spread the world over often destroying existing cultures and local self-determination along its way.
Globalisation as liberalisation wherein globalisation refers to “a process of removing government-imposed restrictions on movements between countries in order to create an open, borderless world economy.” (Scholte 2000); or globalisation as universalisation in which the word global is used to mean worldwide, “globalisation” thus meaning the process of making various objects and experiences available to people at all corners of the earth’ e.g. the internet and television. Consequently anti-globalisation suffers from the same hereditary problem and although it can definitely be argued that there is a continuous spine there is most certainly ambiguity and uncertainty in the differing views and groups attached the subject.
Anti-globalisation is most often used as an umbrella phrase for a group of different protest causes, including anti-capitalism and opposition to multinationals, third world debt, child labour, environmentalism, animal rights, nationalism and anarchism. The two ways I see it best to divide anti-globalisation are Anti-Capitalism and Alter-Globalism.
Anti-capitalists are simply those who want to totally replace capitalism with another system such as communism or anarchism. Alter-globalists can be defined as people who believe in capitalism but also believe there should be changes to the current globalisation regime so it promotes the primacy of, amongst other things, human rights rather than economic progression. In this essay I will be focusing on the latter of these two definitions.
Alter-globalisation’s political line is close to that of anti-globalisation but differs as it chooses to present itself as championing the international integration of globalisation while pushing for the values of democracy, economic justice, human rights and environmental protection to be put ahead of solely economic concerns. Noam Chomsky on the subject of being Alter-globalist rather than anti-globalist at the World Social Forum in 2002,
“The dominant propaganda systems have appropriated the term “Globalisation” to refer to the specific version of international economic integration that they favour, which privileges the rights of investors and lenders, those of people being incidental. In accord with this usage, those who favour a different form of international integration, which privileges the rights of human beings, become “anti-globalist.” This is simply vulgar propaganda, like the term "anti-Soviet" used by the most disgusting commissars to refer to dissidents.
It is not only vulgar, but idiotic. Take the World Social Forum, called "anti-Globalisation" in the propaganda system -- which happens to include the media, the educated classes, etc., with rare exceptions. The WSF is a paradigm example of Globalisation. It is a gathering of huge numbers of people from all over the world, from just about every corner of life one can think of, apart from the extremely narrow highly privileged elites who meet at the competing World Economic Forum, and are called "pro-Globalisation" by the propaganda system. An observer watching this farce from Mars would collapse in hysterical laughter at the antics of the educated classes.” (Chomsky 2002)
Multinationals ar
