Assignment格式论文栏目提供最新Assignment格式论文格式、Assignment格式硕士论文范文。详情咨询QQ:1847080343(论文辅导)

Assignment写作基本要求:Word Count、Reference和Similarity,及非常重要的Reference

日期:2018年05月29日 编辑:ad201011251832581685 作者:无忧论文网 点击次数:2173
论文价格:免费 论文编号:lw201608211026366499 论文字数:800 所属栏目:Assignment格式论文
论文地区:美国 论文语种:中文 论文用途:论文写作指导 Instruction
字数(Word Count)
你不可能把字数把握的恰到好处,所以几乎所有的文字性作业(Assignment, Essay, Research和Dissertation)的字数要求都可以上下浮动的。要求2000字的assignment,实际字数可以上下浮动10%,比如说你可以写1800字或者2200字,但不要超出这个范围。 3000字以上的assignment只能上下浮动5%,就是2850 – 3150。所以你5000字的毕业论文不可以写4500字。大多数情况下,尽量往多里写,尽量不要低于标准,理论上你写1800字导师不能因此将你fail,但是导师可能会讲insufficient evidence或者insufficient support。
建议2000字assignment写2050-2080字刚刚好,你可以先写1800字然后拿给导师看下,然后修改下,最后差不多刚好达到这个字数。

下面是University of East London对字数的要求:
You should provide your word count at the end of your report or essay. This should exclude your abstract, contents page, reference list/bibliography and appendices. 
You must not exceed the permitted word count by more than 10%.  
If your work is significantly shorter, you will probably have failed to provide the level of content required.”
Reference
大多数学校只接受Harvard Reference Style,少部分学校接受任何一种Reference Style,但是不允许两种以上的Reference Style 出现在Reference List里,也就是说只能选一种style,但是选择权在自己手里。
Reference 非常重要,虽然它看起来只值5%的分数,但是使用不恰当或者References数量不足会直接导致Assignment被Fail或低分。
我们来看看Reference的重要性:
 
University of East London对reference的要求:
“You will have learnt in your Level 1 skills module that using someone else’s work without acknowledgement (referencing) is plagiarism, even if you express their findings in your own words. 
Some assignments will require you to find published information and use it in your assignment in which case you will gain marks for finding these sources, and you should inform the reader of their origins by providing references: 
a short reference within your report or essay and full details in the reference list and/or bibliography at the end of your work。”

如果你引用别人的观点,你必须referencing,即使你是用自己的语言写在assignment里的。换句话说,假如你一整句或者一整个论点都被 Turnitin发现是抄袭的,同时你又没有referencing,这些内容会被算做抄袭,这一段内容不会被給出任何分数。虽然这只是理论上的事情,基本上没人这么较真,但是这种情况会被有经验的导师反感,会被直接给出整体40分这样的低分。所以假如你有引用,一定要referencing。
有些部分内容需要你引用别人的观点,作为你assignment的support,所以你必须referencing。这将直接决定你作业的分数高低。来看看reference如何影响你的分数。
University of East London对reference的详细要求,看看reference是如何影响你的成绩的。 Level 1 表示大一;Level 2表示大二;Level 表示大三。
假如你达到了最低的reference要求,大一时你还不至于被fail,到了大二和大三,如果你assignment里的reference太少或者格式不对,甚至达不到要求,assignment会被直接fail或者低分。想要写好的assignment,你的论点(arguments)需要被学者support,reference就是你被support证据。在语法不好的情况下,或者内容偏题的情况下,reference就是保证分数的武器,它能保一方平安。
 
General guidelines for standards expected at different levels of study.
Grade
Level 1
Level 2
Level 3
(70% or above)
Thorough understanding of relevant ideas.  Clear and well refe-renced argument.  Coherent structure.
Ideas critically analysed.  Argument is clear, succinct and well supported.  Evidence of a wide range of reading and some independent thought.
Critical work evidencing excellent synthesis and application of ideas.  Work is exceptionally well constructed and presented.
(60-69%)
Sound understanding.  Well written and relevant argument.  Appropriately referenced.
Critical consideration of relevant ideas.  Arguments are precisely defined and appropriately referenced.  The work is structurally sound and well written.
Ideas are critically applied and coherently presented.  Evidence of wide reading and some originality.  Well referenced
(50-59%)
Evidence of understanding and independent reading.  Adequate referencing, but some unsubstantiated material.  Weaknesses in spelling, structure & grammar.
Reasonable understanding of the relevant concepts, but some inconsistencies in application.  Arguments are referenced, but disjointed.  Poor structure, spelling or grammar.
Clear grasp of concepts and some critical application.  Appro-priat-ely referenced and relevant argument.  Reasonable structure and syntax.  Well presented
(40-49%)
Indication of some understanding, but poor application of ideas.   Minimal referencing.  Generally  weak structure.
Generally descriptive work with limited evidence of a critical consideration of ideas.  In-adequate referencing.  Weaknesses in structure, spelling and grammar.
Evidence of good