is and prevents from further building upon the controversies identified by other research theorists which are primarily associated with these core characteristics.
留学生作业的第一部分讨论了构成纯粹官僚组织的一般特征。因此，我认为，这些官僚特征是有意识地形成的，目的是以最有成效和效率的方式实现组织的目标。本文的第二部分提供了对当前组织结构模式的分析性审查，以帮助确定现代组织中仍然存在的官僚元素的范围。由于给定的范围限制，本文的主要内容仅概述了韦伯理想型官僚制的概念，很少有批判的方法来对官僚制和后官僚制时代进行根本分析。然而，这一限制限制了我的分析，并阻止了进一步建立在其他研究理论家提出的主要与这些核心特征相关的争议之上。
Although bureaucracy entails with it words such as red tape and inefficiency, bureaucracy is only a type of an organizational structure and there is no unanimously acknowledged perspective whether it is good or bad. Referring to Grey’s (2009) idea that bureaucracies are well suited for businesses that involve routine task or “machine-like operations” rather than for those which experience rapid technological changes, I reject the exclusive consideration of either bureaucracies or post-bureaucracies. The aforementioned idea implies that we live either in a purely bureaucratic epoch, or one which completely washes away the bureaucratic features; in other words a post-bureaucratic one. Although bureaucracy, with its adequately defined rigid features to some extent is indeed incompatible with today’s growth and rapid change; yet in my view all organizations in some way or the other demonstrate certain degree of bureaucratic characteristics. As for this, I endorse Höpfl’s (2006) idea that a ‘complete transition’ from bureaucracy to a modern era would require either a death of hierarchy, or some measures that are entirely incompatible with bureaucracy. In light of all this, it can thus be concluded that despite the criticism directed towards bureaucracy, we are in the midst of a threshold – both bureaucracy and modernity still continue to live with us.
留学生作业总结到尽管官僚主义伴随着繁文缛节和效率低下等字眼，但官僚主义只是一种组织结构，它的好坏并没有得到一致认可的观点。提到格雷的观点，即官僚机构非常适合那些涉及日常任务或“类似机器的操作”的企业，而不是那些经历快速技术变革的企业，我拒绝对官僚机构或后官僚机构的排他性考虑。上述观点意味着，我们要么生活在一个纯粹的官僚时代，要么生活在完全洗去官僚特征的时代；换言之，是一个后官僚时代。尽管官僚主义在某种程度上确实与今天的增长和快速变化不相容，但它有着充分定义的僵化特征；但在我看来，所有组织都以某种方式表现出一定程度的官僚特征。关于这一点，我赞同Höpfl的观点，即从官僚制到现代的“完全过渡”需要等级制度的消亡，或者采取一些与官僚制完全不相容的措施。鉴于所有这些，我们可以得出结论，尽管有人批评官僚主义，但我们正处于一个门槛——官僚主义和现代性仍然与我们生活在一起。本站提供各国各专业留学生作业写作指导服务，如有需要可咨询本平台。
