Paper范文-《十二怒汉》电影中的社会心理学理论。本文是一篇留学生电影专业的paper写作范文，影片《十二怒汉》讲述了一个陪审团试图对一起谋杀案做出裁决的故事，这起谋杀案涉及一个被指控谋杀父亲的年轻男孩。起初，除了一名陪审团成员外，几乎所有陪审团成员都同意男孩有罪。在影片的其余部分，陪审团中不确定男孩是否有罪的一名成员向整个陪审团提出了足够的合理怀疑，以便每个成员单独决定男孩是否有罪。最终，经过激烈的讨论，陪审团成员确信这名男孩无罪。这部电影描绘了与社会心理学有关的各种理论。本篇paper范文将从以下几个方面讨论这些理论：群体过程、态度变化和整合。下面就一起来看一下这篇paper写作范文的具体内容。
The film "12 Angry Men" is a narrative about a jury looking to establish a verdict pertaining to a murder case, which entails young boy who had been accused of the murder of his father. At first, almost every member of the jury, except one, agrees that the boy is guilty. Throughout the rest of the film, the one member of the jury who is unsure about the guilt of the boy brings up enough reasonable doubt for the whole jury so that each member individually decides if the boy is guilty or not. Eventually, after heated discussions, the jury members are convinced that the boy is not guilty (12 Angry Men, 1957). The movie has portrayed various theories related to social psychology. This paper will discuss these theories in the following areas: group process, change of attitude, and conformity.
Conformity 从众心理
Within the context of the film, and the situation that the jury members were in, conformity appears to be a dangerous device. The movie portrays the power of normative and informational social influence, which are theories that were introduced by Solomon Asch, Muzafer Sherif, among other researchers (Barrett, 2017). In line with the informational social influence theory, people conform because they have belief in the interpretation of other individuals regarding a situation, and they believe that such an interpretation is more valid and salient than their interpretation (Barrett, 2017).
在电影的背景下，以及陪审团成员所处的情况下，从众似乎是一种危险的手段。这部电影描绘了规范和信息社会影响的力量，这是由Solomon Asch、Muzafer Sherif和其他研究人员提出的理论。根据信息社会影响理论，人们之所以认同，是因为他们相信其他人对某一情况的解释，并且他们认为这种解释比他们的解释更为有效和突出。
Judging the interpretations of other individuals regarding an ambiguous event usually leads to the conformity that is a result of the informational social influence. The processes of decision making that are described in the movie can be explained using this theory.
判断其他人对模糊事件的解释通常会导致从众心理，这是信息社会影响的结果。电影中描述的决策过程可以用这个理论来解释。
Conformity, as a result of social influence, is evident in the first parts of the movie. Inside the jury room, an initial vote precludes heated discussions about the innocence of the young boy. Because the vote was taken publicly, room for normative social influence has been given, and it is at this point that the aspect of social influence or conformity comes in because no one wishes to look like he is deviant. Hesitancy is evident as the members of the jury cast their initial vote. It is more evident among the eleven members who voted that the boy is not innocent. This can be regarded as a weak conviction that is influenced by the guilty majority vote.
作为社会影响的结果，从众性在电影的前几部分很明显。在陪审团会议室里，初步投票排除了对这名年轻男孩无罪的激烈讨论。因为投票是公开进行的，所以为规范性的社会影响力提供了空间，而正是在这一点上，社会影响力或合规性的方面出现了，因为没有人希望自己看起来像是离经叛道的。当陪审团成员投了第一票时，犹豫是显而易见的。在投票的11名成员中，更明显的是，这名男孩并非无辜。这可以被视为受到有罪多数票影响的微弱信念。
Two of the jury members clearly demonstrate normative social influence. One of these men, even before the vote is taken, declares that the boy is guilty. The other man interjects as soon as the vote is taken that "There should always be one." Both jury members make an effort to exploit normative social influence and convince the rest of the members that voting guilty is applicable.
两名陪审团成员清楚地表明了规范的社会影响力。其中一名男子甚至在投票前就宣布这名男孩有罪。另一名男子在投票一开始就插话说：“应该总是有一个。”两名陪审团成员都努力利用规范性的社会影响力，并说服其他成员投票有罪是适用的。
Informational social influence is seen through the time constraints that the jury members are subjected to. Perceived pressure on the jurors, affects the jury process and significantly leads to conformity, which is in line with the normative informational social influence. Time is a significant factor that determines the normative social influence in the film. Also, the jury experiences an additional time constraint because
