of their needs and wishes. The film describes the lives of the jury members on a number of aspects; for example, one sickly jury member declares that he has three stations that he must attend to, which in some way implies to his businesses. This, among other declarations by some jury members, puts the whole team under a time constraint, which, in essence, has some role in the guilty and conformist votes that the jury members cast.
信息社会影响是通过陪审团成员受到的时间限制来看待的。陪审员所感受到的压力会影响陪审团的进程，并显著导致一致性，这符合规范的信息社会影响。时间是决定电影中规范性社会影响力的重要因素。此外，由于陪审团的需要和愿望，陪审团会受到额外的时间限制。这部电影从多个方面描述了陪审团成员的生活；例如，一位体弱多病的陪审团成员宣布，他有三个工作岗位必须负责，这在某种程度上暗示了他的业务。这，以及一些陪审团成员的其他声明，使整个团队受到时间限制，本质上，这对陪审团成员投下的有罪和墨守成规的选票有一定影响。
The movie also exemplifies two sides; the guilty vs. not guilty, where each faction is led by individuals exhuming strength and power. The jury members had no prior relationship ties. Nonetheless, the two leaders prove that they are powerful and are a rich source of influence. Every member of the jury shows admiration and respect for the faction leaders before changing their votes.
这部电影也体现了两个方面；有罪与无罪，每个派别都由发掘力量和权力的个人领导。陪审团成员之前没有任何关系。尽管如此，这两位领导人证明他们是强大的，是一个强大的影响力来源。陪审团的每一位成员在改变选票之前都对派系领导人表示钦佩和尊重。
Conformity is also facilitated by the immediacy aspect of the social impact theory (Rock & Rock, 2014). It would be difficult to dissent within the confines of the room that the jury members were in. Also, without anonymity, it would be more difficult to dissent. Norm perception is also a significant factor that enhances conformity. Prejudice and stereotypes were common at the time the movie was first aired. In a smart manner, the film scripters use the film to talk about the rampant and scornful racism. The sickly member of the jury uses racism to make his decision, which may have significantly contributed to the arousal of negative social norms and made others also to base their votes on the boy's ethnic background.
社会影响理论的直接性也促进了一致性。在陪审团成员所在的房间内，很难提出异议。此外，如果没有匿名，就更难提出异议了。规范认知也是提高一致性的一个重要因素。在电影首次播出时，偏见和刻板印象很普遍。电影编剧以一种巧妙的方式，用这部电影来谈论猖獗和轻蔑的种族主义。这位体弱多病的陪审团成员利用种族主义来做出决定，这可能极大地助长了负面社会规范的觉醒，并使其他人也基于男孩的种族背景来投票。
Henry Fonda, the one jury member who initially voted that the boy was innocent, demonstrates an aspect of the social impact theory, and majority influence while in support of others. The social impact theory outlines that when majority rulings are widespread and immediate, it leads to conformity (Rock & Rock, 2014). Fonda's not-guilty only vote is not in line with this theory but supports the theory of an ally in dissent, which is an aspect of the theory of social impact and majority theory, that the existence of one individual who does not agree with the rest is likely to lead into other dissenting too. This happens later in the movie when Fonda influences the rest of the jury members to vote that the boy is innocent.
亨利·方达是最初投票认定男孩无罪的陪审团成员，他展示了社会影响理论的一个方面，以及在支持其他人时的多数人影响力。社会影响理论概述了当多数人的裁决广泛且即时时，它会导致一致性。方达的无罪投票不符合这一理论，但支持持不同意见的盟友理论，这是社会影响理论和多数派理论的一个方面，即一个人的存在与其他人的意见不一致可能会导致其他人的反对。这发生在电影的后期，方达影响其他陪审团成员投票认定男孩是无辜的。
The age aspect of the social impact theory is also evident. Solomon Asch outlines that the conformity of older people is less likely (Kundu & Cummins, 2013), and this is seen when the oldest member of the jury becomes the first member to break from conformity and declare that the boy is innocent. Conformity happens through informational and normative social influence, and social impact and the influence of the majority. The movie portrays how efficient these theories are.
社会影响理论的年龄方面也很明显。Solomon Asch概述了老年人从众的可能性较小，当陪审团中最年长的成员成为第一个脱离从众并宣布男孩无罪的成员时，就可以看到这一点。整合通过信息和规范的社会影响、社会影响和大多数人的影响而发生。这部电影描绘了这些理论的效率。
Change of attitude and persuasion 态度和说服力的改变
Persuasion, being an integral element of attitude, is a significant aspect of the movie. Persuasion entails the processes by which attitudes are changed (Albarracín & Vargas, 2010). There are two persuasion routes, in line with John Cacioppo and Richard Petty: central and peripheral (Petty & Caciop
