In capitalist conditions, the expansion and operator encroach on right of the owner's equities, the most prominent of the most concentrated expression of the way Japan "manager revolution". The so-called "manager revolution", which is in Japanese capitalism process, the operator-the manager class with its operator position, gradually to the identity of the capitalist functions, in the process of the bourgeoisie. In the modern western capitalist class, especially the increasingly divided into the owner (investors) and operators (agent) two big classes, is the property rights and the right of management separation the personification of the performance. In Japan, as a function of the capitalists manager class, after long term business, broke from the Meiji restoration monopoly capital of Japan after family situation, become a far more than the number in family capital group and individual capitalists new bourgeois class.
Business owners' equity by the occupation of the structure of the separation of the cause instability, in modern economic activities in common. It is in the earliest Yugoslavia and decentralization of the model state, decentralized structure stability first show. The former Yugoslavia famous economist · Syria's DuShang than fellowship in 1973 publication "Yugoslavia social development thought and practice (1945-1973)," a book points out: "before the start of the s, the structure in the society is dominant, and http://www.51lunwen.org/historyedu/2012/0227/lw201202270958521291.html then, especially from 1965 economic reform on, the social process growing" manager "and" technocrat "ruling workers autonomy. The basic principle of the political structure and purpose are the rights of the economic management scholars and workers, taken away to the collective management. But," transfer "to the rights of workers, most of whom are handed over to the workers, and little to leadership group. This is not directly producers perfect autonomous concept has a political thought legal title, the so-called" expert of governing structure. "visible, Syria's fellowship at that time than it already noticed, Yugoslavia practised a" workers autonomy "motive and effect are not uniform. And this kind of phenomenon, it is decentralized model of logic contradiction of the reflection in reality. Some other countries of eastern Europe in a similar situation. Poland famous scholars jarraud krzyzewski pointed out in the mid '80 s:" technology noble-bureaucratic management system gradually make direct producers can't of the economy, society-on political decisions, and weaken the representative agencies and workers autonomy role. "", to cap it prompted the ownership by the whole people to" private group "ownership transformation. "
Operators class in "decentralization" rise in the process. With this process, and social interests distribution pattern also change. Syria's than union wrote: "in the" management class "and the workers at the same time, start to appear divided the social differences and get rich process. Formed a so-called" middle class ". According to some researchers estimate, China accounts for about 2% of the total population to achieve a high degree of the developed countries of the so-called "middle class" standards; accounts for about 10% of the population (that is the most attractive salary the) close to this level; on the other hand, about 20% of the population living in the lowest survival within BiaoZhunXian."
In fact, the pattern of decentralization in eastern European countries do have a serious social differentiation. The 70 s and early 80 s, the two western countries, the United States and Japan and two take decentralization mode countries of eastern Europe, Yugoslavia and Hungary of social wealth distribution by comparing, can find: south, the two countries whom social differentiation level already and beauty, the two countries, approximately the same. If residents will be according to the income level, etc are divided int
