However, two rights separation may lead to social results, the relations of production and superstructure, the impact in different social condition, it is different. In capitalist conditions, independent operators the emergence of capitalist class means team expansion, it broke through the property hereditary system, has some of the progressive significance, but in general the capitalist production material private ownership of still is a must. In socialist conditions the case is more complex and two rights separation may not only broke state ownership, and fails to bring social ownership. Just as in cole points out, the market socialist period operators become political system directly after upheaval business and manager class candidate. From the socialist transformation of the private ownership of the entrepreneurs directly under the condition of the capitalist, become a "new" capitalist system of the social basis. In the book in chapter 7 of the spontaneous privatization stage this part of the people is also the biggest beneficiaries.
Card of darfur in formulating economic policies, very careful not to hurt the two social basis: the operator and the general public interests. However, the interests of the polarization of the two basic ideas are changed, business operators hope that through the change of the economic system of his economic interests to form (private property is inviolable) fixed down, and ordinary people don't think he is the owner of the society, prefer to believe that the state-owned enterprise everyone is master, no one is responsible for the actual. This paradox is intriguing.
