疗。疫苗、维生素和治疗药物都经过科学管理。然而，有些医生不仅是宗教人士，他们还是同一宗教的教师，他们经常告诉你“他们治疗，上帝治愈”。
A look at various inputs by well-known individuals on harmonizing religion and science-because it can be done since both are inseparable. The late William H. Bragg, a British physicist, argued that from religion a man derived his purpose while from science, his power to achieve it. His position was that religion and science are opposed to one another but in the sense that the thumb and fingers of my hands are opposed to one another. Ultimately, it is an opposition by means of which anything can be grasped.
看看知名人士在协调宗教和科学方面的各种投入，因为这是可以做到的，因为两者是不可分割的。已故的英国物理学家威廉·H·布拉格认为，一个人从宗教中获得了自己的目标，而从科学中获得了实现目标的力量。他的立场是，宗教和科学是对立的，但从我手上的拇指和手指是对立的。归根结底，它是一种可以把握一切的对立。
Of course, there has to have been divergent views and the best example is Physicist Stephen Hawking’s. He opines that here is a fundamental difference between religion, which is based on authority, and science, which is based on observation and reason. He however agreed that although there is this difference, the two can still co-exist, affirming the views of Victor J. Stenger, Emeritus Professor of Physics, University of Hawaii that Religion and science are like oil and water and are fundamentally incompatible. However, he added that they can co-exist but they can never mix to produce a homogeneous medium.
当然，肯定有不同的观点，物理学家斯蒂芬·霍金就是最好的例子。他认为，基于权威的宗教与基于观察和理性的科学之间存在根本区别。然而，他同意，尽管存在这种差异，但两者仍然可以共存，并肯定了夏威夷大学物理学名誉教授维克多·J·斯坦格的观点，即宗教和科学就像石油和水，从根本上说是不相容的。然而，他补充说，它们可以共存，但永远不能混合产生均匀的介质。
Furthermore, we have to come alive to the fact that every domain has some lacking. While religion might lack tangible evidence in matters creation and existence, science lacks backing in ethical matters. Alister McGrath avers that most scientists would agree that scientific methods do not cover moral questions (McGrath, 2010). Richard Dawkins wrote in his book The best American science and nature writing that science has no methods for deciding what is ethical” (Dawkins, 2003, P.34). Because of this religion is, according to McGrath, as important as science.
此外，我们必须认识到，每个领域都有一些不足之处。虽然宗教在物质创造和存在方面可能缺乏有形证据，但科学在伦理问题上缺乏支持。Alister McGrath认为，大多数科学家都同意科学方法不涉及道德问题。理查德·道金斯在《美国最好的科学与自然》一书中写道，科学没有办法决定什么是道德的”。
Alister McGrath claims that neither science nor religion is absolute, meaning that they do not have all the answers (McGrath, 2010). I agree to the extent that both domains work to complement each other. The two fields are different which should enable them to harmonize and work to complement each other instead of contradicting one another. In fact when you look at it, the discussion on science and religion does allow us to appreciate both domains as distinct entities and appreciate them for the role they play to make existence wholesome.
Alister McGrath声称，科学和宗教都不是绝对的，这意味着他们没有所有的答案。我同意这两个领域相辅相成。这两个领域是不同的，这应该使它们能够协调一致，相互补充，而不是相互矛盾。事实上，当你看它的时候，关于科学和宗教的讨论确实让我们能够将这两个领域视为不同的实体，并欣赏它们在使生活健康方面所起的作用。
To conclude, I agree with Francisco Ayala, a biologist at the University of California, Irvine that evolution and religious beliefs need not be in contradiction with science because they concern different matters. Science and religion are like two different windows for looking at the world. Science concerns the processes that account for the natural world while Religion concerns the meaning and purpose of the world and of human life, the proper relation of people to the Creator and to each other, the moral values that inspire and govern people’s lives.
References 参考文献
Barbour, I. G. (1998). Religion And Science: historical and Contemporary Issues, (Rev.ed) London: SCM Press.
Dawkins, R., & Folger, T. (Eds.), The best American science and nature writing.(2003). Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
McGrath, A. E. (2010). Science and Religion: a New Introduction (2.ed.). [Malden, MA:] Wiley-Blackwell.
Nicole, A. (2018). The relationship between religion and science: Illustrated through creationism and humanism
Norman, R. (2012). On h
