语言学论文栏目提供最新语言学论文格式、语言学硕士论文范文。详情咨询QQ:1847080343(论文辅导)

中美文学学位论文文献综述中的互文性语用对比之语言学研究

日期:2020年01月21日 编辑:ad201107111759308692 作者:无忧论文网 点击次数:2582
论文价格:150元/篇 论文编号:lw202001101027196174 论文字数:50255 所属栏目:语言学论文
论文地区:中国 论文语种:中文 论文用途:硕士毕业论文 Master Thesis
of the study of intertextuality, theoretical study accounts for the majority. And  the  study  can  be  mainly  divided  into  schools  of  structuralism,  post-structuralism and deconstructionism. In addition, the study of intertextuality from pragmatic view and cross-cultural view is also an indispensable part.  

2.1.1 Structural views

Structuralism was founded by Swiss linguist Saussure (1974) in the later period of 20th  century.  It  gains  its  currency  in  western  countries  and  becomes  one  of  the  most commonly used research tool of analyzing language, culture and society. Structuralism emphasizes  that  the  whole  is  superior  to  the  part,  which  attaches  importance  to  the study  of  the  inherent  law  of  literature  itself  and  advocates  that  the  text  should  be regarded  as  a  self-contained  and  closed  system.  Structuralism  insists  that  in  order  to analyze  certain  phenomena,  whether  linguistic  or  social  phenomena,  we  must  first understand  their  internal  structure  as  intertextuality  both  horizontally  and  vertically interwoven.

(1) View of linguistic signs 

It is generally recognized that intertextuality takes its direct origin from Saussure?s linguistic theory, particularly Saussure?s view of linguistic signs. In his book Course in General Linguistics, Saussure claims that “language is a system of signs and each sign can  be  imagined  as  two  sides  of  a  coin,  one  side  is  signifier  and  the  other  side  is signified” (Saussure, 1974: 131). According to Saussure, the linguistic sign will not be associated  with  characteristics  of  meaning  on  its  own,  instead  it  can  gain  meaning  by virtue  of  its  similarity  to  or  difference  from  other  signs,  which  indicates  that  a  sign possesses meaning “not because of a referential function but because of their function within a linguistic system” (Allen, 2000: 8). Saussure also maintains that the meanings produced  within  language  also  interrelate  with  each  other  and  they  depend  on  the process  of  association  within  different  sign  systems.  And  those  vast  networks  of similarities and differences are regarded as synchronic features of language system.

....................


2.2 Practical Study of Intertextuality

For a long time, scholars both at home and abroad have emphasized the theoretical study of intertextuality. In recent years, intertextuality research has become a hot topic. More attention has been paid on the applied research of intertextuality such as the field of  literature,  translation  and  linguistics,  especially,  the  application  of  intertextuality theory in linguistics has opened up another important research direction besides literary criticism and translation studies.

2.2.1 Applied research in literature 

Intertextuality was first proposed as a  way of literary criticism and its object was “text”. According to Samoyault (2003), intertextuality should first be understood as a way of literary system and multiple forms of text. Gradually, intertextuality has become an  important  narrative  strategy,  which  plays  a  critical&nb