初中英语教学论文栏目提供最新初中英语教学论文格式、初中英语教学硕士论文范文。详情咨询QQ:1847080343(论文辅导)

新手型与专家型教师在初中英语阅读教学中课堂提问的对比研究

日期:2020年12月31日 编辑:ad201107111759308692 作者:无忧论文网 点击次数:1500
论文价格:300元/篇 论文编号:lw202012270936019844 论文字数:38555 所属栏目:初中英语教学论文
论文地区:中国 论文语种:English 论文用途:硕士毕业论文 Master Thesis

本文是一篇初中英语教学论文研究,本研究旨在从问题类型、提问策略、回答方式、等待时间和教师反馈五个方面探讨新手教师和专家教师在英语阅读教学中课堂提问的异同。提出了三个研究问题,主要研究结果基于课堂观察、学生问卷调查和访谈。


Chapter I Introduction


1.1 Background of the research

Classroom  questioning  is  not  only  a  major  way  of  communication  between  teachers and  students,  but  also  a frequently  used  strategy  in  teaching.  Questioning  was  one  of  the basic ways used by the teacher to stimulate students’ thinking and learning (Aschner, 1961). Wilen  (1991)  stated  that  high-quality  classroom  questioning  can  improve  teachers’ teaching behavior, increase students’ participation in classroom, stimulate students’ interest in  learning,  and  promote  communication  and  interaction  between  teachers  and  students, thus improving students’ communicative competence. As Wang Qiang (2002) noted that classroom questioning is an indispensable element in English teaching, which can be found in  any  type  of  a  lesson,  such  as  listening  or  speaking,  writing  or  reading,  grammar  or vocabulary. So it is obvious that the classroom questioning is the main language input link for students, and it is also the effective means of guiding students to learn English. 

Reading plays a significant role in English teaching. FLTRP, an English textbook for junior high school students, has one reading text in each unit. Reading is not only helpful for  students  to  accumulate  basic  language  knowledge  and  strengthen  comprehensive language  skills,  but  also  the  main  way  for  students  to  understand  English  cultural background  and  other  countries’  cultural  customs.  Fostering  students’  reading comprehension  ability  is  crucial  to  junior  high  school  English  teaching.  However,  the status of English reading teaching is quite not satisfying. Although students can understand the  reading  materials,  they  have  difficulty  expressing  their  opinions  in  English,  which means they can understand language input, but they cannot produce understandable output. 

..........................


1.2 Purpose and significance of the study

This  study  is  to  make  a  comparison  of  classroom  questioning  between  novice  and expert teachers in English reading teaching in junior high school to find out the similarities and differences in terms of questioning types, questioning strategies, wait time, answering ways and teachers’ feedback. Based on the analysis and results of the research, this study is expected to give some suggestions to the teachers on the effective  classroom questioning and make them realize strengths and weakness in their professional development.

Richards  &  Lockhart  (1996)  holds  that  teachers’ questioning  can  not  only  motivate students  to  participate  in  classroom  communication  but  also  make  students  adjust  their utterances to be more understandable. Reviewing the previous studies, it can be seen that there are few comparative studies of classroom questioning in junior high school. Thus, it is of great necessity to do such research.

This research is of great significance in theory and practice. First of all, it meets the requirements  of  English  Curriculum  Standards  for  Junior  High  School  (2011),  which specifi