me concessions even involve important interests such as the issue of non-market economic status. When analyzing such kinds of issues, we should firstly start from macroscopical environment. What’s more, this concession does not do harm rather than good. It makes Western developed countries like the US make heavy concessions in the aspects of not opening Chinese cultural and capital markets. Essentially, Articles of non-market economic status is a kind of technique article instead of basic principle or spirit. Although it definitely inflicts negative impact and loss on Chinese economic and commercial development, it is also a result of China’s incomplete market operation mechanism and some countries’ abuse of the Article. Thus, it is not an obstacle that could not be overcame.
It is possible for importing WTO members to abuse articles of non-market economic status in order to restrict Chinese exporters and producers and impede Chinese economic development. So, we should understand the essence of articles of non-market economic status, and comply with already existed procedures and regulations. Only through this, could Chinese government and enterprises speak out in their own defense reasonably and lawfully in order to avoid further loss. From now on, the dispute between China and other importing WTO members should turn to more essential issues. For example, in the aspect of anti-subsidy, two countries should concern whether Chinese government interferes exchange rate market and makes exporting products get profiteering, whether state-owned enterprises or banks belong to public institution, and aspects of calculating benchmark interest rate. These issues are not only the new-round focus of dispute before 2016, but will probably become the hotspot in the fields of world economy after 2016.
