Chapter Six Conclusion
6.1 Major Findings
Through a comparative study on the interpersonal functions of metadiscursive nouns between CANW and CACW, differences as well as similarities between native English writers and Chinese writers have been discovered, and they are summarized as follows:
Firstly, we can draw the conclusion from the overall occurrences that metadiscursive nouns are greatly pervasive in English linguistic academic writings and they play a very important role as cohesive linkage of discourse and as an essential channel for expressing stance and engagement, accounting for 432 cases per 10,000 words. This shows that metadiscursive nouns are significantly critical in academic writer-reader interaction. However, metadiscursive nouns distribute unevenly in the five lexico-grammatical patterns, with the determiner + N pattern appearing the most frequently and the determiner + be + N the least frequently.
Secondly, there are some similarities concerning the application of metadiscursive nouns between English native writers and Chinese writers: (1) Both English native writers and Chinese writers are inclined to employ metadiscursive nouns as interpersonal interaction strategy in their articles with high frequencies of 430.7 and 443.3 of per 10,000 words; (2) The two corpora are consistent in the results that metadiscursive nouns are not evenly used with the five lexico-grammatical patterns. The determiner + N pattern is used most frequently, followed by the N + post-nominal clause pattern. The There be + N pattern, N + be + complement clasue pattern, and determiner + be + N pattern are relatively less used by both two groups of writers; (3) In the interactive dimension, both corpora retrieved overwhelming frequency of anaphoric uses of metadiscursive nouns over cataphoric uses, with only 2.5 cases in CANW and 3.3 ones in CACW every 10,000 words within the determiner + N pattern; (4) In the interactional dimension, we conclude from the findings that the frequency of stance expression is much higher than that of engagement in both CANW and CACW.
reference(omitted)