essay写作栏目提供最新essay写作格式、essay写作硕士论文范文。详情咨询QQ:1847080343(论文辅导)

“解构组织”方法论批判分析

日期:2018年10月15日 编辑:ad200901081555315985 作者:无忧论文网 点击次数:1337
论文价格:100元/篇 论文编号:lw201605092054096293 论文字数:2109 所属栏目:essay写作
论文地区:其他 论文语种:English 论文用途:大学作业 BA essay
uctions organizations are illustrated from so many aspects by Martin Kilduff. As the concentrated content, this part will be analyzed in the methodologies of this paper. In the limits part, Martin Kilduff gave out two limiting factors: “exclusion and distortion of previous texts”; difficult to relate textual analysis with institutions. In the conclusion part, Martin Kilduff summarized that March and Simon’s text is an eternal classic in traditional organization studies; in understanding standard textual, deconstruction just might be “particularly useful”. 

3.0 Literature Review of ‘Deconstructing Organizations’ 

4.0 Main Methodology of ‘Deconstructing Organizations’ 
5.0 Deconstructive Approach 

6.0 Conclusion 总结

In one sentence, the reasoning methods of Martin Kilduff in text---deconstructing organizations are very strict and the reasoning process is very well-conceived. It is worth learning and studying for me in the future researching process.  Martin Kilduff reviews so many literatures and the conclusion is sufficiently to get. Even like this, there are still some shortcomings, such as Martin Kilduff concerns too much on two papers and the researching methods are also not objective enough or interested into readers. But generally speaking, author of this paper believes the researching and studying of Martin Kilduff is success and convincing. 

7.0 References文献

Martin Kilduff. (1993). Deconstructing Organizations. The Academy of Management Review. Vol.18, No.1, P13-P31

March J. G. & Simon H. A. (1958). Organizations. New York: Wiley
Agger B. (1991). Critical theory, poststructuralism, postmodernism: their sociological relevance. Annual Review of Sociology. Vol.17, P105-P131
 Sullivan Patricia. (2004). Jacques Derrida Dies; Deconstructionist Philosopher. Washington Post, October 10, 2004
Pidgen Charles R. (1990). On a defence of derrida. The Critical review. Issues30–32, P40–P41
Rihoux Benoît. (2006). Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA) and Related Systematic Comparative Methods: Recent Advances and Remaining Challenges for Social Science Research. International Sociology. Vol.21, No.5
Savin-Baden M. & Major C. (2013). Qualitative Research: The Essential Guide to Theory and Practice. Routledge
Fischer C.T. (2005). Qualitative research methods for psychologists: Introduction through empirical studies. Academic Press.