3.0 Literature Review of ‘Deconstructing Organizations’
4.0 Main Methodology of ‘Deconstructing Organizations’5.0 Deconstructive Approach
6.0 Conclusion 总结
In one sentence, the reasoning methods of Martin Kilduff in text---deconstructing organizations are very strict and the reasoning process is very well-conceived. It is worth learning and studying for me in the future researching process. Martin Kilduff reviews so many literatures and the conclusion is sufficiently to get. Even like this, there are still some shortcomings, such as Martin Kilduff concerns too much on two papers and the researching methods are also not objective enough or interested into readers. But generally speaking, author of this paper believes the researching and studying of Martin Kilduff is success and convincing.
7.0 References文献
Martin Kilduff. (1993). Deconstructing Organizations. The Academy of Management Review. Vol.18, No.1, P13-P31
March J. G. & Simon H. A. (1958). Organizations. New York: WileyAgger B. (1991). Critical theory, poststructuralism, postmodernism: their sociological relevance. Annual Review of Sociology. Vol.17, P105-P131
Sullivan Patricia. (2004). Jacques Derrida Dies; Deconstructionist Philosopher. Washington Post, October 10, 2004
Pidgen Charles R. (1990). On a defence of derrida. The Critical review. Issues30–32, P40–P41
Rihoux Benoît. (2006). Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA) and Related Systematic Comparative Methods: Recent Advances and Remaining Challenges for Social Science Research. International Sociology. Vol.21, No.5
Savin-Baden M. & Major C. (2013). Qualitative Research: The Essential Guide to Theory and Practice. Routledge
Fischer C.T. (2005). Qualitative research methods for psychologists: Introduction through empirical studies. Academic Press.