帮写dissertation论文栏目提供最新帮写dissertation论文格式、帮写dissertation硕士论文范文。详情咨询QQ:1847080343(论文辅导)

英国毕业论文各部分写作内容讲解

日期:2020年03月22日 编辑:ad200904242025371901 作者:无忧论文网 点击次数:12325
论文价格:免费 论文编号:lw202003020002396090 论文字数:0 所属栏目:帮写dissertation论文
论文地区:其他 论文语种:中文 论文用途:论文写作指导 Instruction
at acupoints not related to hypertension

18 sessions over 6 weeks

12 weeks

No

Appendix 8: CASP Critical Appraisal


Macklin et al., 2006

Flachskampf et al., 2007

Yin et al., 2007

Kim et al., 2012

Zheng et al., 2016

Zheng et al., 2018

Did the trial address a clearly-focused issue?


Yes – the effect of acupuncture on hypertension

Yes – the effect of acupuncture on hypertension

Yes – the effect of acupuncture on hypertension

Yes – the effect of acupuncture on hypertension in relation to the circadian rhythm

Yes – the effect of acupuncture on hypertension in relation to brain electrical activity

Yes – the effect of acupuncture on hypertension

Was the assignment of patients to treatments random-ised?


Yes – process of randomisation not specified

Yes – process of randomisation not specified

Yes – process of randomisation not specified

Yes – through a manual process of randomisation

Yes – process of randomisation not specified

Yes – through an electronic process of randomisation

Were all of the patients who entered the trial properly accounted for at its conclusion?


Yes – as per flowchart (p.840)

Yes – as per flowchart (p.3124)

Yes – as per flowchart (p.1149)

Yes – as per flowchart (p.919)

Yes – as per flowchart (p.3)

Yes – as per flowchart (p.415)

Were patients and study personnel ‘blind’ to treatment?


No

No

No

No

No

No


Were the groups similar at the start of the trial?


Yes – most participants identified as ‘White’, but there were no other significant differences

Yes – there were no significant differences between the groups at baseline

Yes – there were no significant differences between the groups at baseline

Yes – there were no significant differences between the groups at baseline

Yes – there were no significant differences between the groups at baseline

Yes – there were no significant differences between the groups at baseline

Aside from the experi-mental intervention, were the groups treated equally?


Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

How large was the treatment effect?


Measured to the nearest 0.1 mmHg

Measured to the nearest 0.1 mmHg

Measured to the nearest 0.01 mmHg

Measured to the nearest 0.0+1 mmHg

Measured to the nearest 0.01 mmHg

Measured to the nearest 0.1 mmHg

How precise was the estimate of the treatment effect?


Precise: measured using p-values with confidence intervals

Precise: measured using p-values with confidence intervals

Precise: measured using p-values with confidence intervals

Precise: measured using p-values with confidence intervals

Precise: measured using p-values

Precise: measured using p-values with confidence intervals


Can the results be applied to the local population, or in your context?


Yes – showed active acupuncture is no more effective than sham acupuncture for reducing systolic or diastolic BP

Yes – showed active acupuncture is more effective than sham acupuncture for reducing systolic or diastolic BP. However, the effects of the acupuncture are notsustained

Yes – showed active acupuncture is more effective than sham acupuncture for reducing BP

Yes – showed active acupuncture may be more effective than sham acupuncture for reducing nighttime diastolic BP only

Yes – showed active acupuncture may be more effective than sham acupuncture for reducing systolic BP only

Yes – showed active acupuncture is more effective than sham acupuncture for reducing BP

Were all clinically-important outcomes considered?


Yes – age, race, gender, baseline BP, history of anti-hypertensive medication use, obesity, primary TCM diagnosis

Uncertain – there was a focus on baseline BP only

Uncertain – the potential confounders controlled for in analysis (if any) were not specified

Uncertain – the potential confounders controlled for in analysis (if any) were not specified

Uncertain – the potential confounders controlled for in analysis (if any) were not specified

Uncertain – the potential confounders controlled for in analysis (if any) were not specified

Are the benefits worth the harms and costs?


Two patients in the active acu