2.2 Studies at Home
Professor Zhang Helong says, “To study British postmodern novels, it is impossible to avoid the novels of John Fowles” (1). The Collector’s domestic academic research interest was weaker than in The French Lieutenant’s Woman. There are a multitude of opinions about The Collector. Some consider this a great novel, yet others find it crude. Due to its unique plot, many critics have praised it. Comparative studies, existentialism, feminism, psychological analysis, character image analysis, and narrative methodologies dominate Chinese scholarship in this work.
Scholars first examined The Collector’s relationship to other works. If one attentively reads The Collector, “Caliban”—the protagonist’s character image—and the secluded basement become familiar. Researchers have demonstrated The Collector’s connection to other literary works through these details. The Collector exhibits “intertextuality” in various ways, as shown by diligent reading and investigation. Using restricted intertextuality theory, Xu Fang feels this work is intertextual to Shakespeare’s The Tempest and a satire of Robinson Crusoe. According to broad intertextuality theory, this work reflects post-WWII society’s “anger” and existentialist philosophy’s serious thinking on human freedom (89). Some scholars have also examined the relationship between The Collector and other Fowles’s works, combining them in one dimension to compare and contrast. Zhao Pan compared Fowles’s The Collector and The Magus, claiming that both novels are about men’s maturation and that the male heroes mature beneath women and divinity (96). Instead, Kong Beibei addresses women’s free development in The Collector and The French Lieutenant’s Woman. She believes that Fowles has made a qualitative leap in the shaping of female characters and women’s views, and his understanding of women’s freedom and liberation has become more profound and thorough (71). The French Lieutenant’s Woman and The Collector, according to Zhao Jianfen, use Sarah, Fowles’s spokesperson, and Miranda, a sacrifice in a patriarchal society, to inspire people to fight for their natural rights and freedoms (180).
CHAPTER III THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK ..................... 13
3.1 James Phelan and Unreliable Narration ........................... 13
3.2 Narrative Process and Ethical Position ............................... 15
CHAPTER IV THE “FIRST-PERSON” UNRELIABLE NARRATION .................... 20
4.1 Estranging Unreliable Narrator ....................... 20
4.2 Bonding Unreliable Narrator ................................. 25
CHAPTER V TEXTUAL MOTIVATION IN NARRATIVE PROCESS .................... 31
5.1 Instability in the Stor