ansmitters with different frequencies,if available, should be used together as high frequency waves exhibit good resolution but poor penetration depth, while the lowfrequency waves showinsufficient resolution but relatively large penetration depth. In addition, the experiment should be carefully planned as both ERT and IP measurements are time-consuming processes.
Appendix A
Appendix B
Appendix C
References
BLEIL, D. F. 1953. Induced polarization: a method of geophysical prospecting. Geophysics, 18, 636-661.
BUTLER, D. K. 2005. Near-surface geophysics, Society of Exploration Geophysicists Tulsa.
DAILY, W., RAMIREZ, A., BINLEY, A. & LEBRECQUE, D. 2004. Electrical resistance tomography. The Leading Edge, 23, 438-442.
DANIELS, D. J. 2005. Ground penetrating radar, Wiley Online Library.
EVERETT, M. E. 2013. Near-surface applied geophysics, Cambridge University Press.
SLICHTER, L. 1933. The interpretation of the resistivity prospecting method for horizontal structures. Journal of applied physics, 4, 307-322.
SUMNER, J. S. 2012. Principles of induced polarization for geophysical exploration, Elsevier.
